They sound like drugs, but these "Meths" aren't illicit, although they can cause brain-strain. Our Meths (methodology or recipe for a carbon credits project) are about to change. EG. The compulsory forfeiture of intellectual property in carbon "meths" has finally been identified as a disincentive to involvement in the CFI (Glossary below.) by The DCCEE. It is one of a series of important shifts proposed in the new Draft Guidelines, out for consultation.
Intellectual property is covered in 3 places: 1. “You will retain all
intellectual property rights in respect of your application, but you must agree
to allow it to be copied, used and modified by DCCEE and others for the purpose
of the CFI.” 2. “Acceptable
justification would include that the information should not be published if it
reveals, or could be capable of revealing: trade secrets; or any other matter
having a commercial value that would be, or could reasonably be expected to be,
destroyed or diminished if the information were disclosed.” 3. “If you have applied, or
intend to apply for a patent concerning a methodology proposal, you should
contact DCCEE before you submit a proposal.”
Positive
List: “The activity
must be included on the positive list before the methodology proposal can be
assessed. “ (This creates a chicken-or-egg
confusion with the Positive List guidelines released on October 2011 which
tells us that the “Activity is covered by an approved methodology.” Which comes
first? Positive List or Methodology?)
The difficulty a farmer would have in taking a Meth off the shelf and using it is blamed on the Language adopted for the submission: “It is important that
language and instructions are clear and unambiguous.” The Devil is in the Detail: “This item must be sufficiently detailed to allow project proponents to successfully implement the proposed activity by following these instructions. “
Instead of making up your own terminology: “…many terms are
defined in the CFI glossary, the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative)
Act 2011 and the Regulations. Refer to these documents before defining a
new term.”
And a new challenge for those working on soil carbon: “The process for
estimating abatement is divided into 5 parts: 4) Item 11.4 – Account for cyclical
variation.” This means a meth is expected to take account of the background cycles of emissions and sequestration before applying a new land management regime. You can see what it means: new levels of complexity, new layers of measurement, new costs, new hoops to jump through. New reasons for disengagement among farmers.
But there is good news: There is a Soil Carbon Methodology about to be ratified by the VCS - the most important standard in the voluntary market. This will mean many things: 1. We can start using it to design projects. 2. We can adapt parts of it to use with our CFI meths. 3.We can apply to the DOIC to have it recognised under the CFI.
DCCEE - Department of Climate Change and Energy Effciency.
CFI - Carbon Farming Initiative
DOIC - Domestic Offsets Integrity Committee
VCS - Verified Carbon Standard
No comments:
Post a Comment